Fresh evidence here.
This entry was posted on Thursday, January 24th, 2008 at 7:22 pm and is filed under Academia, Feminists in Academia. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
I think it’s worth quoting the results of the study cited in that link:
Double-blind peer review, in which neither author nor reviewer identity are revealed, is rarely practised in ecology or evolution journals. However, in 2001, double-blind review was introduced by the journal Behavioral Ecology. Following this policy change, there was a significant increase in female first-authored papers, a pattern not observed in a very similar journal that provides reviewers with author information. No negative effects could be identified, suggesting that double-blind review should be considered by other journals.