Per the NYT: The bill was approved on a 65-to-34 vote, with 14 Democrats joining 51 Republicans in favor. A similar measure passed the House last year, and President Bush said he would sign the legislation if the two chambers could work out their differences and send a final bill to him.
I hope those 14 Democrats start getting dumped on by reproductive rights advocates as much as Joe Lieberman is, assuming he isn’t one of them…
–Ann Bartow
Update: Here is a list of the votes. Lieberman voted against the legislation, known as the Child Custody Protection Act. The Democrats who voted in favor of it were: Bayh (D-IN), Byrd (D-WV), Carper (D-DE), Conrad (D-ND), Dorgan (D-ND), Inouye (D-HI), Johnson (D-SD), Kohl (D-WI), Landrieu (D-LA), Nelson (D-FL), Nelson (D-NE), Pryor (D-AR), Reid (D-NV), and Salazar (D-CO). Dianne Feinstein didn’t vote at all.
[...] I need to start by noting that I have contributed money to Ned Lamont’s Senate campaign and I hope he wins. Though Joe Lieberman has been better than many Democrats (including Harry Reid) on reproductive rights issues, he has been less than perfect, and I am in complete disagreement with his views on the Iraq war, and on many other foreign policy issues as well, so I would be very pleased to see him replaced in the Senate by Ned Lamont. That being said, I am completely sickened by this, which was republished in part here: A lot of thanks Clinton got for his pragmatic centrism, too. He came within a hairsbreadth of being driven from office (with the help of his friend Joe) and when the Republicans took over they took the pragmatic surplus he created, handed it out to their rich friends and then proceeded to govern from as far right as they could possibly get with no thought to “collegial” moderation. [...]